Well, may as well give a little detail on the "no-fly zones," since this is actually picking up some media steam.
Essentially, there are two "no-fly zones" in northern and southern Iraq because the US and UK want them there. Not because the UN put them there, not because of a declaration of surrender by Iraq, not because humanitarian groups called out for them, but because the US and UK decided to create them.
The US and UK claim that the zones are justified by two UN Security Council resolutions, 678 (passed in late 1990), and 688, passed a few months after the end of the Gulf War.
678 was passed in response to the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait, and "authorizes Member States ... to use all necessary means ... to restore international peace and security in the area." While "the area" is vague, the resolution seems aimed at getting Iraq out of Kuwait and stopping any of its agression against other states.
688 was passed in response to Iraqi oppression of its people, particularly the Kurds in Northern Iraq. It "condemns the repression of the Iraqi civilian population in many parts of Iraq, including most recently in Kurdish populated areas, the consequences of which threaten international peace and security in the region."
Now watch the trick here.
If Iraqi oppression of the Kurds "threaten[s] international peace and security," and resolution 678 authorizes all UN member states to "use all necessary means ... to restore international peace and security in the area," then....
Ipso facto, presto change-o, the US and UK have a right to bomb the bejeezus out of Northern and Southern Iraq.
No one at the UN seems to agree with this interpretation. The purpose of 678 was to issue an ultimatum to Saddam Hussein to get out of Kuwait. The purpose of 688 was to condemn Iraqi oppression. Neither was intended to appoint the West as guardian of Iraq. Hell, the whole purpose of the UN is to avoid war and bloodshed. It's hard to argue that regular bombing raids of Iraq work towards that goal.
If you're interested, here's a handy dandy resource to find out when the US/UK last bombed Iraq.
Bottom line. No fly zones stopped the Republican guard from strafing Iraqi civilians. Bombing radar stations is much worse? What's your brilliant idea?
Posted by: Brian at March 21, 2003 10:20 AMLying Media Bastards is both a radio show and website. The show airs Mondays 2-4pm PST on KillRadio.org, and couples excellent music with angry news commentary. And the website, well, you're looking at it. Both projects focus on our media-marinated world, political lies, corporate tyranny, and the folks fighting the good fight against these monsters. All brought to you by Jake Sexton, The Most Beloved Man in America ®. contact: jake+at+lyingmediabastards.com |
Media News |
November 16, 2004Tales of Media WoeSenate May Ram Copyright Bill- one of the most depressing stories of the day that didn't involve death or bombs. It's the music and movie industries' wet dream. It criminalizes peer-to-peer software makers, allows the government to file civil lawsuits on behalf of these media industries, and eliminates fair use. Fair use is the idea that I can use a snippet of a copyrighted work for educational, political, or satirical purposes, without getting permission from the copyright-holder first. And most tellingly, the bill legalizes technology that would automatically skip over "obejctionable content" (i.e. sex and violence) in a DVD, but bans devices that would automatically skip over commericals. This is a blatant, blatant, blatant gift to the movie industry. Fuck the movie industry, fuck the music industry, fuck the Senate. Music industry aims to send in radio cops- the recording industry says that you're not allowed to record songs off the radio, be it real radio or internet radio. And now they're working on preventing you from recording songs off internet radio through a mixture of law and technological repression (although I imagine their techno-fixes will get hacked pretty quickly). The shocking truth about the FCC: Censorship by the tyranny of the few- blogger Jeff Jarvis discovers that the recent $1.2 million FCC fine against a sex scene in Fox's "Married By America" TV show was not levied because hundreds of people wrote the FCC and complained. It was not because 159 people wrote in and complained (which is the FCC's current rationale). No, thanks to Jarvis' FOIA request, we find that only 23 people (of the show's several million viewers) wrote in and complained. On top of that, he finds that 21 of those letters were just copy-and-paste email jobs that some people attached their names to. Jarvis then spins this a bit by saying that "only 3" people actually wrote letters to the FCC, which is misleading but technically true. So somewhere between 3 and 23 angry people can determine what you can't see on television. Good to know. Reuters Union Considers Striking Over Layoffs- will a strike by such a major newswire service impact the rest of the world's media? Pentagon Starts Work On War Internet- the US military is talking about the creation of a global, wireless, satellite-aided computer network for use in battle. I think I saw a movie about this once... Conservative host returns to the air after week suspension for using racial slur- Houston radio talk show host (and somtime Rush Limbaugh substitute) Mark Belling referred to Mexican-Americans as "wetbacks" on his show. He was suspended for a couple of weeks, and then submitted a written apology for the racial slur to a local newspaper. But he seems to be using the slur and its surrounding controversy to boost his conservative cred with his listeners. Stay Tuned for Nudes- Cleveland TV news anchor Sharon Reed aired a story about artist Spencer Tunick, who uses large numbers of naked volunteers in his installations and photographs. The news report will be unique in that it will not blur or black-out the usual naughty bits. The story will air late at night, when it's allegedly okay with the FCC if you broadcast "indecent" material. The author of this article doesn't seem to notice that Reed first claims that this report is a publicity stunt, but then claims it's a protest against FCC repression. I'd like to think it's the latter, but I'm not that much of a sucker. More Media News |
Quotes |
"8:45? And here I am yapping away like it's 8:35!" |
Snapshots |
Mission: MongoliaJake's first attempt at homemade Mongolican barbecue: Failure. What went right: correctly guessing several key seasonings- lemon, ginger, soy, garlic, chili. What went wrong: still missing some ingredients, and possibly had one wrong, rice vinegar. Way too much lemon and chili. Result: not entirely edible. Plan for future: try to get people at Great Khan's restaurant to tell me what's in the damn sauce. |