Jesus Fucking Christ.
Remember in the 2001 war with Afghanistan when the U.S. dropped food packages that looked a lot like cluster bomblets?
Well, now it's 2003 and WE'RE DOING IT AGAIN!!!
That's it. I am done. I can't live on the same planet as these motherfuckers.
Well, what can expect?!? The US has those old yellow cluster bombs and those old yellow food packets. They have to use them up somehow.
Proof positive, in my opinion, that the US gives not a damn about civilian casualities.
Posted by: jim at April 3, 2003 03:43 AMHas the Us used the BLU-97 or "daisy utter" bombs in Iraq?
My understanding is that particular munition is used in large, more open areas like Afghanistan.
I think these bombs should be banned, but I dont think they have used them or would use them in Bagdad.
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
I guess the damage has already been done 10 years ago:
http://www.hrw.org/press/2003/03/cluster031803.htm
Lets hope someone in the pentagon has some kind of fucking sense.
I'm not holding my breath...
Posted by: Joe at April 3, 2003 11:35 AMzmag.net has an interview with Noam Chomsky, Noam talking about Iraq just being a testing feild fr what new country they can take over like Iran, or something like that. The Iraq thing scares me, much les more wars, and as Bush said the Sunday before the war, and it disturbed me then.
"This is the first war of the 21st century" speaking as if there were more planned.
Posted by: Zach at April 3, 2003 04:52 PMIf the U.S. didnt care about civilians we would have just flew over Bagdag with a few B-52's or B-1's and totally leveled the entire city in one day. Those bombers have Awesome destructive capabilities and the U.S. has the power to level a city like that without using nuclear weapons. The U.S. has gone to great lengths to protect civilians and I hate to believe that there are people who still can't see that. The Iraqi military has killed and endangered far-far more of there own civilians than we ever did.
Posted by: Demos at April 3, 2003 06:44 PMayy, que horrible.
Posted by: steph at April 4, 2003 09:37 AMI made a forum post about that here:
http://agonist.got.net/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.cgi?board=WorldNews;action=display;num=1049398135
The red cross has sicne confirmed that BLU-97s have been used. The millitary is also using the MLRS system, which has 600+ sub-munitions (19% failiure rate).
Posted by: Doug at April 4, 2003 12:50 PMTo demos:
Yes, I agree that the US is making it painfully obvious how much it is going out of the way to avoid civilian casualties (or to give the appearance thereof), but I believe that the only reason for that is because of the immense global outcry against the war from the outset.
We did not see this kind of humanitarian concern in Afghanistan. This is proven in my opinion, by the fact that George Bush did not include ONE PENNY to help the people of Afghanistan in his 2004 budget. This after pulicly stating that the US will not abandon the Afghan people. Indeed, the stated cause of the current war only changed to the "liberation" of the Iraqi people after 100's of thousands of people took to the streets.
If the same people who were allied with Hussein 15 years ago are telling you they care for the Iraqi people, now, I think its obvious its only spin.
Posted by: Joe at April 4, 2003 02:04 PMHello Joe
Again I'm going to have to disagree. We are continuing to help Afghanistan and here is just one place to see how we are doing it.
http://www.usaid.gov/afghanistan/
There are more sites of course but dont think now that we are in Iraq we will have nothing to do with Afghanistan.
Posted by: Demos at April 4, 2003 07:37 PM
dear demos,
I notice that site you point us to is a [dot]gove site.
tell me why on god's green effin earth the [dot]gov would ever, in a million years, post anything remotely self-critical on their own website?
jeez.
"Hi, my name is Jim Jones, and this is my website! Sign my guestbook! Here's a synopsis of our latest upcoimg retreat to Guyana! Click here for the accomodations--and here for travel arrangements--and here for the menu at the resort! Mmmm! Turkey and jello! Doesn't that sound great folks?!!?"
you were blessed with a brain that has the ability to analyze, question, and utilize both deductive and inductive reasoning. figure it out.
or don't. go out and buy all those Ronco products, lovely cubic zirconium jewels, brand-name cleaning products that will (of course they wll, THEY say so, right?) get yer whites whiter, and whichever carbonated soda whose advertising appeals to you most. while you're at it, vote for the politician with the best ads.
sheesh.
sorry, feeling surly tonight. short fuse and all.
Posted by: michele at April 6, 2003 01:40 AMYeah. I'd believe anything I read on a [dot]gove site. Anything at all.
Especially from this administration.
Posted by: Lurch at April 6, 2003 07:01 AMThe reason I pointed to a government web site was because we were talking about the government abandening Afghanistan. I just pointed to ways that they were helping. I understand things can be biased but if your sitting here telling me that absolutely none of those things the site talks about is happenening than I believe your living in more of a paranoid "the government is out to get us" world and nothing can be shown to you to believe otherwise. It would have to be that you honestly believed that things were better off for them than before we went over there. And I'm sure their gangs rule buy fear type government was much better.
Posted by: Demos at April 6, 2003 08:18 PMDemos:
Karzai (A former employee of Gulf oil and who ran UNOPPOSED in the Loya jurga) has no power outside of Kabul. The majority of Afghanistan has now resumed being ruled by the same tribal warlords whose lawless rule paved the way for the taliban.
I think the Bush administrations dedication to aiding "liberated" countrys is best exmplified by the fact that Bush allocated a grand total of $0.00 (thats NOTHING) of the 2004 budget for humanitarian aid to Afghanistan.
Posted by: Joe at April 7, 2003 11:53 AMLying Media Bastards is both a radio show and website. The show airs Mondays 2-4pm PST on KillRadio.org, and couples excellent music with angry news commentary. And the website, well, you're looking at it. Both projects focus on our media-marinated world, political lies, corporate tyranny, and the folks fighting the good fight against these monsters. All brought to you by Jake Sexton, The Most Beloved Man in America ®. contact: jake+at+lyingmediabastards.com |
Media News |
December 01, 2004Media MamboThe Great Indecency Hoax- last week, we wrote about how the "massive outcry" to the FCC about a racy Fox TV segment amounted to letters from 20 people. This week, we look at the newest media scandal, the infamous "naked back" commercial. On Monday Night Football, last week, ABC aired an ad for it's popular "Desperate Housewives" TV show, in which one of the actresses from the show attempted to seduce a football player by removing the towel she was wearing to bare her body to him. All the audience saw, however, was her back. No tits, no ass, no crotch, just her back. No one complained. The next Wednesday, Rush Limbaugh told his shocked viewers how the woman had appeard in the commercial "buck naked". Then, the FCC received 50,000 complaints. How many of them actually saw this commercial is anyone's guess. The article also shows the amazing statistics that although the Right is pretending that the "22% of Americans voted based on 'moral values'" statistic shows the return of the Moral Majority, this is actually a huge drop from the 35% who said that in the 2000 election or the 40% who said that in 1996 (when alleged pervert Bill Clinton was re-elected). This fact is so important I'm going to mention it over in the main news section too. Brian Williams may surprise America- Tom Brokaw's replacement anchor, Brian Williams, dismissed the impact of blogs by saying that bloggers are "on an equal footing with someone in a bathroom with a modem." Which is really funny, coming out of the mouth of a dude who's idea of journalism is to read words out loud off a teleprompter. Seriously, if parrots were literate, Brian Williams would be reporting live from the line outside the soup kitchen. In related news, Tom Brokaw has quit NBC Nightly News, and it appears that unlike his predecessor, the new guy can speak without slurring words like a drunk. PR Meets Psy-Ops in War on Terror- in February of 2002, Donald Rumsfeld announced the creation of the Office of Strategic Influence, a new department that would fight the war on terror through misinformation, especially by lying to journalists. Journalists were so up in arms about this that the Pentagon agreed to scrap the program. Don't you think that an agency designed to lie to the public might lie about being shut down, too? This article gives some examples about the US military lying to the press for propaganda and disinformation purposes. Tavis Smiley leaving NPR in December- African-American talk show host Tavis Smiley is opting to not renew his daily talk show on National Public Radio. He criticized his former employers for failing to: "meaningfully reach out to a broad spectrum of Americans who would benefit from public radio but simply don’t know it exists or what it offers ... In the most multicultural, multi-ethnic and multiracial America ever, I believe that NPR can and must do better in the future." He's 100% correct. NPR is white. Polar bear eating a marshmallow at the mayonaise factory white. And the reason it's so white is that it is trying to maintain an affluent listener base (premoniantly older white folks) who will donate money to their stations. This is a great paradox of American public broadcasting, that they have a mandate to express neglected viewpoints and serve marginalized communities, but those folks can't donate money in the amounts that the stations would like to see. U.S. Muslim Cable TV Channel Aims to Build Bridges- it sounds more positive than it is "Bridges TV" seems to simultaneously be a cable channel pursuing an affluent American Muslim demographic, and a way of building understanding and tolerance among American non-Muslims who might happen to watch the channel's programming. I was hoping it would be aimed more at Muslim's worldwide, but it ain't. Still, I'd be interested in seeing how their news programs cover the issues. Every Damned Weblog Post Ever- it's funny cuz it's true. Wikipedia Creators Move Into News- Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia, created collectively by thousands of contributors. It's one of those non-profit, decentralized, collective, public projects that show how good the internet can be. Now, the Wikipedia founders are working on a similar project to create a collaborative news portal, with original content. Honestly, it's quite similar to IndyMedia sites (which reminds me, happy 5th birthday, IndyMedia!). I'll admit, I'm a bit skeptical about the Wikinews project, though. IndyMedia sites work because they're local, focused on certain lefty issues, and they're run by activists invested in their beliefs. I'm not sure what would drive Wikinews or how it would hang together. CBS, NBC ban church ad inviting gays- the United Church of Christ created a TV ad which touts the church's inclusion, even implying that they accept homosexuals into their congregation. Both CBS and NBC are refusing to air the ad. This is not too surprising, as many Americans are uncomfortable about homosexuality, and because TV networks are utter cowards. But CBS' explanation for the ban was odd: "Because this commercial touches on the exclusion of gay couples...and the fact that the executive branch has recently proposed a Constitutional amendment to define marriage as a union between a man and a woman, this spot is unacceptable for broadcast." Whoa, what? First of all, the ad does not mention marriage at all. Second, since when do positions opposite of the Executive Branch constitute "unacceptable"? This doesn't sound like "we're not airing this because it's controversial", this sounds like "we're afraid of what the President might say." More Media News |
Quotes |
"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of what he was never reasoned into." -Jonathan Swift |
Snapshots |
Damn. That joke would have been much funnier if I'd said "apprentice" instead of "intern". |