Here in California, we have a shitty, mercenary governor named Gray Davis. Davis will face a "recall" vote in October, where Californians get to decide whether or not Davis remains governor, and if not, who gets to replace him.
The recall is 100% partisan. A huge amount of money was spent on this effort, especially by would-be Davis-replacement Darrell Issa. Issa is a scumbag who tries (and sometimes succeeds) in buying his way into public office.
Well, just to put Mr. Issa in his place, go check out this handy chart which compares many of Issa's claims about his past to what the historical record shows.
My favorite nugget in there is that Issa was arrested in 1973 for driving around with a loaded, unlicensed, semiautomatic pistol, and a tear gas gun.
Sure, as a god fearing american it's his consitutional right to carry around a fucking AK-47 and rocket launcher to defend himself right?
Posted by: Arcterex at July 31, 2003 10:29 AMSure, as a god fearing american it's his consitutional right to carry around a fucking AK-47 and rocket launcher to defend himself right?
Posted by: Arcterex at July 31, 2003 10:30 AMSurely, you wouldn't hold a couple of felonies against a fella would you? After all, both our president and vice president are the first felons to occupy the White House. Darrell Issa is just another New Republican.
Posted by: Mike at July 31, 2003 03:14 PM"first felons to occupy the White House" is putting it nicely. 6000+ dead Iraqui civilians and 3000+ dead Afghani civilians.... seems to me "mass murderers" is a more appropriate description, particularly since the hijackers were Saudis, not Afghanis, a the WMD premise to attack Iraq was phoney (as well as many other 'justifications').
Nah, this ain't Orwell. It's Huxley. What's on American Idol tonight?
Posted by: Rush Limbaugh at August 1, 2003 07:50 AMthe only thing i got from my years living in california was skin cancer and herpes. i currently live in georgia where we have a governor named "sonny." now that's that's a step up.
Posted by: blotto blotto at August 2, 2003 01:12 PMthe only thing i got from my years living in california was skin cancer and herpes. i currently live in georgia where the governor is named "sonny." a step up...a step down?...who knows.
Posted by: blotto blotto at August 2, 2003 01:16 PMIssa is a common criminal, a true republican.
Posted by: slap you at August 2, 2003 06:14 PMIssa is a fukin liar, a true blue repugnant
Posted by: Keith at August 2, 2003 06:16 PMIssa is a fukin liar, a true blue repugnant
Posted by: Keith at August 2, 2003 06:16 PMsuch hateful comments. let's have a dance and forget all this, this...modern life. it goes like this...
come now all and kick up the heels, an old polka tune i'm told...
come, they told me, pa ruppup pum pum/a new born king to see, pa rup pup pum pum/our finest gifts to bring, pa rup pup pup pup/to lay before the king, pa rup mpum, rup pupn pum pum/so to honor him pa rup pup pum pum when we come.
now wasn't that fun?
Posted by: blotto blotto at August 8, 2003 04:16 PMwhy are you people so filled with hate? california was doomed when it inhaled every dreamer who thought "another chance." a song, perhaps...
"fly me to the moon /and let me play among the stars/let me me see what spring is like/on jupiter and mars/in other words, hold my hand/in other words, darling, kiss me"
Posted by: debbie at August 8, 2003 04:43 PMam i the only one here? if so i'm going to do my al jolsen routine.
Posted by: at August 15, 2003 01:54 PMwhy do i feel like a pisshead? maybe it's because i live in california. i'm leaving. you can have it. maybe join the army. maybe they'll send me to iraq. i'd like to be sent to iraq...maybe open a nudie carwash.
Posted by: at August 21, 2003 01:47 PMbye bye california. i'm joining the army and hope to be sent to iraq. many opportunities there. i plan on opening a nudie carwash.
Posted by: sane person at August 21, 2003 01:52 PMThis is a one time shot but I couldn't resist.
I see a lot of comments here and they're angry..
one guy says something about an AK-47 and a rocket launcher. You don't need those to defend yourself.. but they're great recreation and it's hell of a lot cheaper than golf and apparently less dangerous than driving. Someone else says something about 6000+ dead iraqi civilians and 3000+ dead afghan civilians. First, the Iraqis.. 6000? Nothing compared to the numbers Saddam wracked up. Second, the Afghans.. 3000 civilians? I doubt you'd find that many civilians in the whole country. First you'd have to define civilian. There are a lot of well armed "civilians" in Afghanistan. Some of these "civilians" occasionally serve thier local warlord or tribal leader. So I can't take those numbers very seriously when it's a land full of guerillas.
This is a one time shot but I couldn't resist.
I see a lot of comments here and they're angry..
one guy says something about an AK-47 and a rocket launcher. You don't need those to defend yourself.. but they're great recreation and it's hell of a lot cheaper than golf and apparently less dangerous than driving. Someone else says something about 6000+ dead iraqi civilians and 3000+ dead afghan civilians. First, the Iraqis.. 6000? Nothing compared to the numbers Saddam wracked up. Second, the Afghans.. 3000 civilians? I doubt you'd find that many civilians in the whole country. First you'd have to define civilian. There are a lot of well armed "civilians" in Afghanistan. Some of these "civilians" occasionally serve thier local warlord or tribal leader. So I can't take those numbers very seriously when it's a land full of guerillas.
This is a one time shot but I couldn't resist.
I see a lot of comments here and they're angry..
one guy says something about an AK-47 and a rocket launcher. You don't need those to defend yourself.. but they're great recreation and it's hell of a lot cheaper than golf and apparently less dangerous than driving. Someone else says something about 6000+ dead iraqi civilians and 3000+ dead afghan civilians. First, the Iraqis.. 6000? Nothing compared to the numbers Saddam wracked up. Second, the Afghans.. 3000 civilians? I doubt you'd find that many civilians in the whole country. First you'd have to define civilian. There are a lot of well armed "civilians" in Afghanistan. Some of these "civilians" occasionally serve thier local warlord or tribal leader. So I can't take those numbers very seriously when it's a land full of guerillas.
Lying Media Bastards is both a radio show and website. The show airs Mondays 2-4pm PST on KillRadio.org, and couples excellent music with angry news commentary. And the website, well, you're looking at it. Both projects focus on our media-marinated world, political lies, corporate tyranny, and the folks fighting the good fight against these monsters. All brought to you by Jake Sexton, The Most Beloved Man in America ®. contact: jake+at+lyingmediabastards.com |
Media News |
December 01, 2004Media MamboThe Great Indecency Hoax- last week, we wrote about how the "massive outcry" to the FCC about a racy Fox TV segment amounted to letters from 20 people. This week, we look at the newest media scandal, the infamous "naked back" commercial. On Monday Night Football, last week, ABC aired an ad for it's popular "Desperate Housewives" TV show, in which one of the actresses from the show attempted to seduce a football player by removing the towel she was wearing to bare her body to him. All the audience saw, however, was her back. No tits, no ass, no crotch, just her back. No one complained. The next Wednesday, Rush Limbaugh told his shocked viewers how the woman had appeard in the commercial "buck naked". Then, the FCC received 50,000 complaints. How many of them actually saw this commercial is anyone's guess. The article also shows the amazing statistics that although the Right is pretending that the "22% of Americans voted based on 'moral values'" statistic shows the return of the Moral Majority, this is actually a huge drop from the 35% who said that in the 2000 election or the 40% who said that in 1996 (when alleged pervert Bill Clinton was re-elected). This fact is so important I'm going to mention it over in the main news section too. Brian Williams may surprise America- Tom Brokaw's replacement anchor, Brian Williams, dismissed the impact of blogs by saying that bloggers are "on an equal footing with someone in a bathroom with a modem." Which is really funny, coming out of the mouth of a dude who's idea of journalism is to read words out loud off a teleprompter. Seriously, if parrots were literate, Brian Williams would be reporting live from the line outside the soup kitchen. In related news, Tom Brokaw has quit NBC Nightly News, and it appears that unlike his predecessor, the new guy can speak without slurring words like a drunk. PR Meets Psy-Ops in War on Terror- in February of 2002, Donald Rumsfeld announced the creation of the Office of Strategic Influence, a new department that would fight the war on terror through misinformation, especially by lying to journalists. Journalists were so up in arms about this that the Pentagon agreed to scrap the program. Don't you think that an agency designed to lie to the public might lie about being shut down, too? This article gives some examples about the US military lying to the press for propaganda and disinformation purposes. Tavis Smiley leaving NPR in December- African-American talk show host Tavis Smiley is opting to not renew his daily talk show on National Public Radio. He criticized his former employers for failing to: "meaningfully reach out to a broad spectrum of Americans who would benefit from public radio but simply don’t know it exists or what it offers ... In the most multicultural, multi-ethnic and multiracial America ever, I believe that NPR can and must do better in the future." He's 100% correct. NPR is white. Polar bear eating a marshmallow at the mayonaise factory white. And the reason it's so white is that it is trying to maintain an affluent listener base (premoniantly older white folks) who will donate money to their stations. This is a great paradox of American public broadcasting, that they have a mandate to express neglected viewpoints and serve marginalized communities, but those folks can't donate money in the amounts that the stations would like to see. U.S. Muslim Cable TV Channel Aims to Build Bridges- it sounds more positive than it is "Bridges TV" seems to simultaneously be a cable channel pursuing an affluent American Muslim demographic, and a way of building understanding and tolerance among American non-Muslims who might happen to watch the channel's programming. I was hoping it would be aimed more at Muslim's worldwide, but it ain't. Still, I'd be interested in seeing how their news programs cover the issues. Every Damned Weblog Post Ever- it's funny cuz it's true. Wikipedia Creators Move Into News- Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia, created collectively by thousands of contributors. It's one of those non-profit, decentralized, collective, public projects that show how good the internet can be. Now, the Wikipedia founders are working on a similar project to create a collaborative news portal, with original content. Honestly, it's quite similar to IndyMedia sites (which reminds me, happy 5th birthday, IndyMedia!). I'll admit, I'm a bit skeptical about the Wikinews project, though. IndyMedia sites work because they're local, focused on certain lefty issues, and they're run by activists invested in their beliefs. I'm not sure what would drive Wikinews or how it would hang together. CBS, NBC ban church ad inviting gays- the United Church of Christ created a TV ad which touts the church's inclusion, even implying that they accept homosexuals into their congregation. Both CBS and NBC are refusing to air the ad. This is not too surprising, as many Americans are uncomfortable about homosexuality, and because TV networks are utter cowards. But CBS' explanation for the ban was odd: "Because this commercial touches on the exclusion of gay couples...and the fact that the executive branch has recently proposed a Constitutional amendment to define marriage as a union between a man and a woman, this spot is unacceptable for broadcast." Whoa, what? First of all, the ad does not mention marriage at all. Second, since when do positions opposite of the Executive Branch constitute "unacceptable"? This doesn't sound like "we're not airing this because it's controversial", this sounds like "we're afraid of what the President might say." More Media News |
Quotes |
"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of what he was never reasoned into." -Jonathan Swift |
Snapshots |
Damn. That joke would have been much funnier if I'd said "apprentice" instead of "intern". |