Conservatives have begun (continued?) to bash away at John Kerry in the oddest of ways: trying to connect him to Jane Fonda. I'm sure that plenty of you don't understand why they'd do that, and that's why I think that this tactic is destined to fail.
During the Vietnam (Indochina) war(s), actress Jane Fonda was a vocal opponent of the US invasion, and in her most outrageous action, she visited North Vietnam in 1972 and spoke out against the US and in favor of the North Vietnamese cause. She has since publicly apologized several times, maybe sincerely, maybe not, I don't know. It seems to me that the public considered her a traitor or an idiot.
But modern anger against her runs deep (if not that wide). Whenever I would take my mother to a doctor's appointment, there was always an aging, faded Buick in the parking lot with matching front and back bumper stickers that read: I'm Not Fonda Hanoi Jane. And I kid you not, just this morning as I drove around thinking about this issue, I saw a pick-up truck with the bumper sticker: Boycott Jane Fonda - American Traitor Bitch.
Conservatives have found a and spread a photograph of an 1970 anti-war rally featuring Jane Fonda in the foreground, with someone who is probably John Kerry about three or four rows behind her and off to one side.
See, see! John Kerry's a traitor just like Jane Fonda.
Taking it one step further, they're also distributing a fake, photoshopped picture of Fonda and Kerry sharing a podium together, allegedly at an anti-war rally. As that link shows, the photo was doctored, taken from a solo shot of Kerry at a podium, and with a photo of Fonda pasted in.
Sigh. A lot of people are going to be taken in by that.
The point is to highlight John Kerry's opposition to the Vietnam war after he returned from duty there, in an attempt to counter his "military cred."
One problem with the specific strategy: people my age and younger think of Jane Fonda as that 80s workout video chick, not as some traitor from the Age of Aquarius. We're likely to think that Kerry and Fonda are speaking out at some sort of protest about aerobics or something, leaving said military cred intact.
The other Kerry attack is a fairly unsubstantiated report from King of the Rumormongers Matt Drudge, which claims that Kerry had an affair. Maybe that story has some backing, maybe not, maybe it'll take off, maybe it won't, but I do appreciate this article pre-empitvely mocking journalists who might choose to pretend that this rumor is an important story.
You might also check out this article, which lists past distortions made by Drudge:
http://www.whoslying.org/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=348&Itemid=1
Also, this one shows how Drudge is being no more truthful with his latest "intern" story: http://www.whoslying.org/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=424&Itemid=26
Posted by: Memekiller at February 15, 2004 11:09 AMKerry and Hanoi Jane, meed we say any more?
Posted by: at February 15, 2004 03:56 PMKerry and Fonda? Perhaps you're referring to this:
http://www.whoslying.org/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=431&Itemid=27
Posted by: Memekiller at February 15, 2004 07:29 PMYou can also find discussion from people trying to get the bumper sticker here: http://knossos.shu.edu/HyperNewsV/get/vp/protest/7/8.html
Posted by: Arcterex at February 16, 2004 10:57 AMQuote from above: "Kerry and Hanoi Jane, meed we say any more?"
Answer: Yes (Duh!)
The problem most Vietnam vets (and Vietnam Vet wannabes ... yep. There are some) have with Jane Fonda is mostly fueled by a photo-op the North Vietnamese took of her visit to Hanoi. They had her sit in the seat of an anti-aircraft gun that had been used to shoot down American pilots. Really, really, really dumb (and in my opion wrong).
But, if I am an anti-abortion advocate and you are an anti-abortion advocate and we are at the same rally, and you happen to be an idiot, that does not make me an idiot. It only makes you an idiot.
Posted by: Woody at February 17, 2004 06:40 AMThe photo of Kerry and Fonda is a doctored phoney. The original was taken by Ken Light, Fonda is no where near the photo. This is a bunch of crapt that is being spread.
Posted by: Ed Gant at February 17, 2004 09:02 AMThe photo of Kerry and Fonda is a doctored phoney. The original was taken by Ken Light, Fonda is no where near the photo. This is a bunch of crapt that is being spread.
Posted by: Ed Gant at February 17, 2004 09:02 AMThe photo of Kerry and Fonda is a doctored phoney. The original was taken by Ken Light, Fonda is no where near the photo. This is a bunch of crapt that is being spread.
Posted by: Ed Gant at February 17, 2004 09:02 AMThe photo of Kerry and Fonda is a doctored phoney. The original was taken by Ken Light, Fonda is no where near the photo. This is a bunch of crapt that is being spread.
Posted by: Ed Gant at February 17, 2004 09:02 AMWho cares? Fonda went and married Ted Turner, former boat racer, media mogol, and raconteur. So?
Kerry went and married somebody with money. So? Bush went and got a Harvard MBA. So?
The economy stinks, and we still are not being told the truth about Iraq.
Find me five people who will say the Viet Nam war was a good idea. Is there a domino theory about Iraq? Once Iraq is conquored and occupied, Iran will be easy, and soon there will be American SUVs lined up right at the well-heads in Saudi Arabia? It looks as if dominos falling over is only a problem if you don't like the guy pushing them over.
The point is what are we doing. What will we be doing? Is it short-term or long-term thinking? Who took the money, who took the money away, as David Byrne sang. Enjoy your MacJob. Get a degree in computer science, if you intend to move to Mumbai.
The American Prospect link was a good one. The Haiti question is fair. What is going on? What, if any American interest is there in Haiti, that could justify interference in Haitian affairs? Why is established media interest so superficial about Haiti, and almost all else? Chomsky's point has been that even when the information is there one must read between the lines.
Anything in the election year detracting from questions of Muslim-related long and short term US foreign policy; the economy and wealth distribution, in the US and world wide; and plans and proposals for domestic policy, should be regarded as non-news. Jane ain't news. End of story.
Posted by: heisenberg at February 18, 2004 10:41 AMLying Media Bastards is both a radio show and website. The show airs Mondays 2-4pm PST on KillRadio.org, and couples excellent music with angry news commentary. And the website, well, you're looking at it. Both projects focus on our media-marinated world, political lies, corporate tyranny, and the folks fighting the good fight against these monsters. All brought to you by Jake Sexton, The Most Beloved Man in America ®. contact: jake+at+lyingmediabastards.com |
Media News |
November 16, 2004Tales of Media WoeSenate May Ram Copyright Bill- one of the most depressing stories of the day that didn't involve death or bombs. It's the music and movie industries' wet dream. It criminalizes peer-to-peer software makers, allows the government to file civil lawsuits on behalf of these media industries, and eliminates fair use. Fair use is the idea that I can use a snippet of a copyrighted work for educational, political, or satirical purposes, without getting permission from the copyright-holder first. And most tellingly, the bill legalizes technology that would automatically skip over "obejctionable content" (i.e. sex and violence) in a DVD, but bans devices that would automatically skip over commericals. This is a blatant, blatant, blatant gift to the movie industry. Fuck the movie industry, fuck the music industry, fuck the Senate. Music industry aims to send in radio cops- the recording industry says that you're not allowed to record songs off the radio, be it real radio or internet radio. And now they're working on preventing you from recording songs off internet radio through a mixture of law and technological repression (although I imagine their techno-fixes will get hacked pretty quickly). The shocking truth about the FCC: Censorship by the tyranny of the few- blogger Jeff Jarvis discovers that the recent $1.2 million FCC fine against a sex scene in Fox's "Married By America" TV show was not levied because hundreds of people wrote the FCC and complained. It was not because 159 people wrote in and complained (which is the FCC's current rationale). No, thanks to Jarvis' FOIA request, we find that only 23 people (of the show's several million viewers) wrote in and complained. On top of that, he finds that 21 of those letters were just copy-and-paste email jobs that some people attached their names to. Jarvis then spins this a bit by saying that "only 3" people actually wrote letters to the FCC, which is misleading but technically true. So somewhere between 3 and 23 angry people can determine what you can't see on television. Good to know. Reuters Union Considers Striking Over Layoffs- will a strike by such a major newswire service impact the rest of the world's media? Pentagon Starts Work On War Internet- the US military is talking about the creation of a global, wireless, satellite-aided computer network for use in battle. I think I saw a movie about this once... Conservative host returns to the air after week suspension for using racial slur- Houston radio talk show host (and somtime Rush Limbaugh substitute) Mark Belling referred to Mexican-Americans as "wetbacks" on his show. He was suspended for a couple of weeks, and then submitted a written apology for the racial slur to a local newspaper. But he seems to be using the slur and its surrounding controversy to boost his conservative cred with his listeners. Stay Tuned for Nudes- Cleveland TV news anchor Sharon Reed aired a story about artist Spencer Tunick, who uses large numbers of naked volunteers in his installations and photographs. The news report will be unique in that it will not blur or black-out the usual naughty bits. The story will air late at night, when it's allegedly okay with the FCC if you broadcast "indecent" material. The author of this article doesn't seem to notice that Reed first claims that this report is a publicity stunt, but then claims it's a protest against FCC repression. I'd like to think it's the latter, but I'm not that much of a sucker. More Media News |
Quotes |
"8:45? And here I am yapping away like it's 8:35!" |
Snapshots |
Mission: MongoliaJake's first attempt at homemade Mongolican barbecue: Failure. What went right: correctly guessing several key seasonings- lemon, ginger, soy, garlic, chili. What went wrong: still missing some ingredients, and possibly had one wrong, rice vinegar. Way too much lemon and chili. Result: not entirely edible. Plan for future: try to get people at Great Khan's restaurant to tell me what's in the damn sauce. |